III.3.2. Pronouns
1.) Personal Pronouns
Because of the weakenings which had already developed in in the
southern dialect of Eleiar, a three-fold system of personal pronouns
developed. This system distinguishes a subject form and a form
for indirect and for the direct object each:
1. person | 2. person |
3. person (m.) |
3. person (f.) |
|
subject | nor | aian | acos | ocos |
indirect object | na | aia | ac | oc |
direct object | norach | aiach | acach | ocach |
4. person | 5. person | 6. person | |
subject | thur | lis | os |
indirect object | thus | lis | as |
direct object | thuchis | lichis | hóchis |
2.) Possessive Pronouns
The possessive were changed according to the personal pronouns.
These changed stems
combined with the gender
particles to give the possessive pronouns
1. person | noma, nomo | 2. person | aema, aemo | 3. person | coma, como |
4. person | thuma, thumo | 5. person | lima, limo | 6. person | oma, omo |
Examples: noma sídd (my people); aemon aethis (your beloved); nomon oldar (my flute.
3.) Demonstrative Pronouns
Here the same system was used:
cina, cino (this, these)
tula, tulo (that, those)
4.) Interrogative Pronoun
The interrogative pronouns stayed in principle unchanged; the
last two cases however were lost and assumed an advebial meaning
(anun: where?; anu?: whereto?)
who? | whose? | whom? | who? |
an? | anu? | anu? | anuch? |
5.) Relative Pronouns
The relative pronouns changed in anology to the personal pronoun:
singular | plural | |
subject | ana, ano | anas, anos |
indirect obect | ania, anio | anias, anios |
direct object | anach, anoch | anachis, anochis |